Skip to main content

A Guide On How To Improve Wrestling Criticism.

Now, before you all verbally eat me alive like a hippopotamus (yes hippos eat humans, look that up), understand that I’m just an average dude writing about pro wrestling and doesn’t claim to be an expert in anything and that includes professional wrestling (except cooking. I’m damn good at cooking). 

However, what I’ve been discovering as a pro wrestling blogger for over a year is that there are some wrestling criticism out there that just make me wanna scratch my head to the point where my hands turn into an electric shaver if that makes sense. For instance, “Why is Ricochet’s trunks red instead of white?” or “Why’s Andrade wearing his Luchador mask for his entrance every week?” 

In other words, they’re nitpicking and trust me I do that ALL THE TIME in my wrestling reviews. There’s nothing wrong with nitpicking certain things but the difference is that I acknowledge that I’m nitpicking and those guys clearly don’t. 

There are fans out there on the interweb that believe their criticisms are nothing but “facts” or the “truth” aka toxic fans (What? I didn’t know that). Now, I’ve compiled a guide on how to improve wrestling criticism and I divided it into three elements. 

Element #1: Self Education. 

This point is especially for all the young fans out there. Now, what do I mean by self-education? Watching old matches before your time, reading articles/watching documentaries about infamous incidents, reading books about pro wrestlers’ lives etc. 

What I’m trying to say is that educating yourself about an industry you love will make you smarter as a result. Also, history repeats itself and when you see a storyline that looks so similar you’ll instantly recognize it. Always educate yourself when you can otherwise you'll look like an idiot in a conversational setting and you don't want that do you? 

Element #2: Listen To Opinions That Are The Opposite Of Yours. 

Listening to different opinions will do two things (or at least it does for me). One, it makes you more aware of the topic and two, it makes you think about the topic. For example, the recent Sasha Banks story. Reading the reports of that story will make you aware of the situation and seeing people talk about the story will make you think about the situation. “Is she entitled or does she wants to be utilized properly on WWE television?” 

A psychology blog called psychreg.org talks about the differences of opinions in the best way possible: 

“While you’re listening to the other person explain their side of things, remember that just because you understand where someone is coming from and why they think what they do, it doesn’t mean that you have to agree with them nor does it mean you’re conceding defeat to them. It just means that you’re willing to listen to their side of things because the other party may have something for you to learn”. 

Element #3: Understand The Subjectivity Of Professional Wrestling. 

This is by far, the most important element on wrestling criticism. If you don’t understand that professional wrestling like any other art form is subjective then I’m sorry, you shouldn’t be talking about pro wrestling. Not understanding the subjectivity of pro wrestling will lead to toxic conversations, egos being build and other worst things. We as human beings can measure a lot of things but the thing we can’t measure is the human experience of a piece of entertainment consumed on a daily basis. 

Just because somebody liked Monday Night RAW (which is not the most popular thing to say) or vice versa that doesn’t mean he or she is a “smark mark” or a “WWE shill”. What it does mean is that they simply liked or disliked a show and that’s what fandom should be. To quote in the style of Roman Reigns: 

“There’s no wrong opinion. There’s no right opinion. There’s THE opinion”. 

I hope you find this informative and if you did, please share it around. Follow me on the tweets @omartheplayaguy and follow the blog for honest pro wrestling opinions. Anyways, stay safe smarks.

Additional sources: www.psychreg.org/respecting-other-peoples-opinion/

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

WWE RAW 4/3/19 | My Coherent Review.

This go home show episode of RAW was decent actually. It made me wanna watch a waste of a PPV called Fastlane with higher expectations.  Opening Segment.  The show kicked off with the Big Dog for the second week in a row. Roman Reigns cut a promo basically saying that this is the fan's yard now and calls out Seth Rollins to the ring. Seth Rollins said that he's gonna take Roman's fight with leukaemia and use it as motivation to beat Brock Lesnar for the Universal Championship.  Roman Reigns replied by telling Seth “good luck” and Roman's wants the band to get back together. Seth Rollins was conflicted at first but later accepted it. Dean Ambrose comes out and he was hit by Elias with a guitar. Decent segment and I was expecting for Drew, Lashley and Corbin to come out but I'm glad that didn't happen. Finn Balor, Braun Strowman and Kurt Angle vs Baron Corbin, Bobby Lashley and Drew McIntyre.  This match was boring three weeks ago and this ...

WWE Smackdown Live 30/10/18 | My Coherent Review.

Smackdown Live yesterday was a skippable show other than the opening segment and match in my opinion. Now usually on my RAW/Smackdown Live review, I break down what's good, what's ok and what's bad. For the first time, I'm only gonna tell you what's ok given that this show was again a skippable show and here we go.  WHAT'S OK The opening segment  This is the probably one of if not most noteworthy moment this week mainly because as you might know, there were reports going around that John Cena and Daniel Bryan were out of Crown Jewel and the reports are indeed true and it makes sense, especially for John Cena considering that he's an actor now and he needs to maintain his PR status. The segment itself was decent. Loved both guys' intensity and that segment leads to a WWE championship match and speaking of which............. Daniel Bryan vs AJ Styles  Decent match. Expected a better from these two but again, decent nevertheless but...

AEW Dynamite Blood And Guts | A Coherent Review.

Another watchable episode of AEW Dynamite but this time, it features the first-ever Blood And Guts encounter. Kenny Omega And Michael Nakazawa vs Jon Moxley And Eddie Kingston.  Don Callis announced that Michael Nakazawa is going to face Mox and Kingston all by himself only for Kenny Omega to show up and compete in the match anyway.  A weird booking choice but I'm just nitpicking.  What wasn't weird was how the match ended with a double team dragon suplex into a clothesline from the duo of Mox and Kingston to Nakazawa.  Then, a beatdown ensued from Omega's Posse to Jonny Mox and Eddie Kingston. The Young Bucks vs Jon Moxley and Eddie Kingston? I'm down.  It was revealed later in the night that a number one contenders match for the AEW championship is set up for next week's show between Orange Cassidy and Pac. I'm assuming AEW is saving the Hangman Page and Kenny Omega encounter for All Out?  Either way, AEW has the potential to tell an interesting story of ...