Skip to main content

A Guide On How To Improve Wrestling Criticism.

Now, before you all verbally eat me alive like a hippopotamus (yes hippos eat humans, look that up), understand that I’m just an average dude writing about pro wrestling and doesn’t claim to be an expert in anything and that includes professional wrestling (except cooking. I’m damn good at cooking). 

However, what I’ve been discovering as a pro wrestling blogger for over a year is that there are some wrestling criticism out there that just make me wanna scratch my head to the point where my hands turn into an electric shaver if that makes sense. For instance, “Why is Ricochet’s trunks red instead of white?” or “Why’s Andrade wearing his Luchador mask for his entrance every week?” 

In other words, they’re nitpicking and trust me I do that ALL THE TIME in my wrestling reviews. There’s nothing wrong with nitpicking certain things but the difference is that I acknowledge that I’m nitpicking and those guys clearly don’t. 

There are fans out there on the interweb that believe their criticisms are nothing but “facts” or the “truth” aka toxic fans (What? I didn’t know that). Now, I’ve compiled a guide on how to improve wrestling criticism and I divided it into three elements. 

Element #1: Self Education. 

This point is especially for all the young fans out there. Now, what do I mean by self-education? Watching old matches before your time, reading articles/watching documentaries about infamous incidents, reading books about pro wrestlers’ lives etc. 

What I’m trying to say is that educating yourself about an industry you love will make you smarter as a result. Also, history repeats itself and when you see a storyline that looks so similar you’ll instantly recognize it. Always educate yourself when you can otherwise you'll look like an idiot in a conversational setting and you don't want that do you? 

Element #2: Listen To Opinions That Are The Opposite Of Yours. 

Listening to different opinions will do two things (or at least it does for me). One, it makes you more aware of the topic and two, it makes you think about the topic. For example, the recent Sasha Banks story. Reading the reports of that story will make you aware of the situation and seeing people talk about the story will make you think about the situation. “Is she entitled or does she wants to be utilized properly on WWE television?” 

A psychology blog called psychreg.org talks about the differences of opinions in the best way possible: 

“While you’re listening to the other person explain their side of things, remember that just because you understand where someone is coming from and why they think what they do, it doesn’t mean that you have to agree with them nor does it mean you’re conceding defeat to them. It just means that you’re willing to listen to their side of things because the other party may have something for you to learn”. 

Element #3: Understand The Subjectivity Of Professional Wrestling. 

This is by far, the most important element on wrestling criticism. If you don’t understand that professional wrestling like any other art form is subjective then I’m sorry, you shouldn’t be talking about pro wrestling. Not understanding the subjectivity of pro wrestling will lead to toxic conversations, egos being build and other worst things. We as human beings can measure a lot of things but the thing we can’t measure is the human experience of a piece of entertainment consumed on a daily basis. 

Just because somebody liked Monday Night RAW (which is not the most popular thing to say) or vice versa that doesn’t mean he or she is a “smark mark” or a “WWE shill”. What it does mean is that they simply liked or disliked a show and that’s what fandom should be. To quote in the style of Roman Reigns: 

“There’s no wrong opinion. There’s no right opinion. There’s THE opinion”. 

I hope you find this informative and if you did, please share it around. Follow me on the tweets @omartheplayaguy and follow the blog for honest pro wrestling opinions. Anyways, stay safe smarks.

Additional sources: www.psychreg.org/respecting-other-peoples-opinion/

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The 5 News Week: Master P Buying House Of Glory!?, NXT TV To Air In Different Arenas!?

Hello, my fellow wrestling fans and welcome to the 5 news week. The post where I report 5 major or minor news of the week that I don't have time to do it separately. Without further ado, here are the 5 news week . Sorry for not posting in two days. Just some personal stuff I gotta deal with and my Coherent Wednesdays review was a bit rushed and I want to nail it in a no pun intended, coherent matter if that makes any sense? Hopefully, my reviews will get better in the coming weeks.  Master P Buying House Of Glory!?  A great example of human beings having an unpredictable nature to them (ask Vince McMahon), Master P was interviewed somewhere in Manhattan and he announced that he has brought an independent wrestling promotion based in New York called House Of Glory or HOG which was founded by Brian XL and Impact Alumni Amazing Red in 2014.  PWInsider and Mike Johnson gave an update to this story stating that Master P will deliver the "muscle and production team" goi...

A Few News I Guess: Buddy Murphy Being Looked At By AEW!?

Since this week's news was dominated by some dudes named Phil Brooks and Bryan Danielson, I decided to deliver my 3 viewers here a few news, guess?  NXT Reshooting A Karrion Kross Scene Due To "Jeff Hardy" Chants.  This is sad yet f**king hilarious. So sad that It's more depressing than what they're doing with Baron Corbin honestly.  From bodyslam.net , they've heard that a segment that involved Karrion Kross cutting a promo before Samoa Joe showed up, had chants of "Hardy". The chants were so noticeable that NXT had to reshoot the segment.  I feel so sorry for Karrion Kross bruh.  Quick Thoughts On Smackdown Yesterday.  You would think with the intrigue being built following Money In The Bank that the outcome of this week's episode is a good one?  Nah. The show was just not good. Roman Reigns made a "missionary" line which I'm sure my Twitter timeline will appreciate. The only positive thing about the episode was the segment with S...

WWE RAW 20/6/22 | A Coherent Review.

RAW was okay. That's it. That's the intro.  Bianca Belair vs Rhea Ripley for the red women's belt ain't happening!?  The reason being is that Rhea Ripley isn't medically cleared to compete so a fatal five-way number one contender's match was set up to determine the new number one contender (spoilers, it's Carmella).  A decision I do not mind or flat out hate.  My 1 and a half viewers will know that I've been critical of WWE's series of rematches but considering it was one of the best matches of the year (yes, I'm talking about Bianca Belair vs Becky Lynch), why not run it back one more time?  Riddle vs Omos. Money In The Bank Qualifying Match.  Y'all are about to be so surprised when I tell you that Omos won a match again.  Omos wins with the double chokeslam to qualify for the Money In The Bank ladder match.  Seth Rollins showed up (used the "forehead loser sign" like every uncle in the 90s to Riddle), stated that he'll be the ...